Enough snot & movies
Mar. 4th, 2009 01:28 pmAfter four women's movies I've quite had it. My head is still not up to spec, though I'm feeling better.
One Night At McCool's, Charlie's Angels, Charlie's Angels Full Throttle, Bridget Jones's Diary and Bridget Jones's Diary the Edge of Reason have all been watched. Enough with the female movies already!
ETA: I'm getting sick of books about women, written by women, where the main character is shunned by all males. If you read the Clan of the Cavebear novels by Jean M. Auel, or like I'm doing right now "She who Remebers" by Linda Lay Shuler, the similarities are striking. Just like Jacqueline Carey must write about all forms of sex and Lauren Weisberger insists on writing how all New York Women must be fabulous creatures tottering about on ten inch heels, these women authors seem to revel in the idea that women in prehistoric societies are shunned for being a witch or being different and then cast out, at which point they find a mate or a lovely young male that goes on to protect them and shelter them and makes the world alright.
I wonder: how much of this lives in our daily society? Are women who are different cast out and shunned by their society? And do they then find a mate to protect them? Does Lauren Weisberger actually write the same kind of books as Jean M. Auel and Linda Lay Shuler, only from a different vantagepoint?
One Night At McCool's, Charlie's Angels, Charlie's Angels Full Throttle, Bridget Jones's Diary and Bridget Jones's Diary the Edge of Reason have all been watched. Enough with the female movies already!
ETA: I'm getting sick of books about women, written by women, where the main character is shunned by all males. If you read the Clan of the Cavebear novels by Jean M. Auel, or like I'm doing right now "She who Remebers" by Linda Lay Shuler, the similarities are striking. Just like Jacqueline Carey must write about all forms of sex and Lauren Weisberger insists on writing how all New York Women must be fabulous creatures tottering about on ten inch heels, these women authors seem to revel in the idea that women in prehistoric societies are shunned for being a witch or being different and then cast out, at which point they find a mate or a lovely young male that goes on to protect them and shelter them and makes the world alright.
I wonder: how much of this lives in our daily society? Are women who are different cast out and shunned by their society? And do they then find a mate to protect them? Does Lauren Weisberger actually write the same kind of books as Jean M. Auel and Linda Lay Shuler, only from a different vantagepoint?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 12:35 pm (UTC)And more get-well-soon-hugs!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:14 pm (UTC)I think it's more of a metaphore for how women in western culture develop. First, they belong to a group of giggling girls, and some women are perfectly happy to stay there for the rest of their life. But most women want to be strong, independant, original, and they are eventually shunned by the group of giggling girls, because that's what they do to people with original ideas. And in the end every woman from our culture dreams of a happy ending with someone who loves her.
But this is only seem from a female point of view. Women do seem to like to form homogenic groups, and if a women becomes too different from the rest of the group, they'll gossip about her and do other negative things until she leaves. Mixed groups, like people who share the same hobby, don't seem to have this problem.
I'm no expert, because I've never had much female friends. I never fit into any kind of girl-group. Roleplay groups with lots of guys were no problem, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:35 pm (UTC)Perhaps the books are also about learning how to do something you're not supposed to do. Women who hunt and are the boss of them. Very feminist, very irregular for that time and society.
I'm now even more confused what the author is trying to say.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:40 pm (UTC)In other news: Dusty does not leave my side - she has the best spot in the house, snuggling up right next to me on my blanket. =)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:23 pm (UTC)I didn't use to have many friends and thus not many female friends. When my friends group grew I still had more guys as friends, but ever since I got my doll hobby I was faced with women groups. Put women together and they'll turn into bitches or so it seems.
Sheesh, the amount of goship I was suddenly faced with... appears to be normal with women groups...
And wouldn't it be better to say "in your face" to all those stuck up all the same bitches when you parade with you handsomely hot knight in shining armour saying you don't need them, which isn't all that true, because you still need an audience to show off your hot catch to or why else would you even bother with that guy who probably snores in his sleep and scratches his butt like any other guy does.
Fiction. Just another word for fantasy. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:37 pm (UTC)I'm now more confused about the book than before.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:44 pm (UTC)In the book I'm reading now (She Who Remembers), there is a disease killing many people of the tribe, and because the woman has blue eyes (okay, not prehistoric society, because she's a descendant of Norwegians and the book plays in ca 1200 AD) she is called a witch and the cause of the death of all these people. She is feared because she is different, or perhaps the disease is so feared they point to her as a cause because she is different.
Superstition has fear at its roots? I think we can agree on that.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:52 pm (UTC)It does tire to read about it all the time. ;)
Maybe you should watch a classic like Jurassic Park. No complicated man-woman issues there.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 09:00 pm (UTC)Lots of passages in Yorkshire dialect though. Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 10:28 pm (UTC)